|
|||||||
| Bream Anglers Tavern Drop in here if you're just surfing with a beer in your hand. Good place to just hang out... |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
no one said anything about catching 5 fish in 5 casts.. its more the fact of its masking sounds and changing perception and mood via sound.. seeing rocks on a sounder doesnt make u catch u fish sure your aware of the structure and the fish holding habitat but to actually change a perception or mood of the fish i think is not fair. this is the argument at hand and the point to draw rhe line but hey thats clearly not gonna happen because if your behind it steve.. also its helping carl a mate of yours so again yea not gonna happen is it. im clearly not the only person who feels this way but i sure am voicing myself
|
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
|
Im sorry but you cant compare the 2.
1 is an improvement on a technology you have allowed from day dot. Gps and sounders have been around for decades. Hydrowave is a new behavioral altering device (whether it works or not). Something that has never been seen before is like nothing else. Rattles and scents have been around since the dawn of lures, Yes they have been improved over the years. But they are old technogy that have been allowed since the inception of bream tornements As i said on facebook, if it doesnt work then it will be no-loss if its banned. It will just stop people getting suckered into a Gimick. I argree the premise of banning it as a technology isnt really there, The more research i do, the less effective i believe it will be, However thats not really the issue, The issue is more if it is, or isnt " in the spirt of the game" Which is surely proven by the public outcry I belive this is the cliff, this is where the line will be drawn, I think we can aggree that this isnt the fish slaying ultiamte turn of machine it claims to be, But if you allow hydrowave, if anything is invented in the future that does live up to the hype, you wont be able to ban it due to letting hydrowave in. Ps: I sincerely look forward to your reply, Its great having educated debate with someone so passionate, and who is willing to attack the issue and not the person, So please dont take this (or our previous debate) as an attack on you
__________________
Australian Designed and Owned |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is there an emoticon for banging one's head against the wall?
If tournament rules were dictated by the Breammaster Luddites' whims we'd have banned: • Fast boats (unfair for slow boats). • Slow boats (unfair to bank anglers). • Non-boaters (I mightn't like the one I get). • Bio-baits (unfair for hard body users). • Hard bodies with scents (how dare the bream think it's food). • Fluorocarbon (unfair to the fish if they can't see your invisible line). • Sounders (ever had a school of bass come sit under your sonar beams?). • Other competitors (they fished my spot). • Talking to anyone about the arena (how dare they get a hint off anyone). Plus Madeye's plastics that 'bream can't resist"! (I'm happy to accept your Facebook bet in your baits, BTW) ![]() I'm bowing out of this one, before I 'help' Carl any more by outlining that I've caught fewer fish after fitting my Hydrowave than I did before it. Plus, you can't argue against: "....the Constitution, it's Mabo, it's justice, it's law, it's the vibe, and, uh ... No, that's it. It's the vibe". SM PS: Not new tech at all. Research "Biosonix", which has been around for near a decade. As few bass guys have these fitted to their boats. Last edited by Steve Morgan; 07-12-2012 at 08:34 AM. Reason: Biosonix. |
|
#94
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm Just about to fit one. The only reason I am getting one is to mask my presence when on the water. It's that simple. The units do not magically put fish in your boat, you still need skill to boat fish. Cheers Lee |
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
|
As i said mate a bet is a bet,
If hyrdrowave isnt a sponsor ill send you $50.......that includes prizes too by the way ![]() I still belive its a ethics issue and a precedence is being set. Its ok though, when finish developing this new super strechy, bio, sound and pheromone emitting plastics that "bream cant seem to resist". I can rest assured you wont ban it ![]() PPS: You forgot to add Pre-fishing to your list. Everyone knows that should be banned too
__________________
Australian Designed and Owned |
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
|
Final ethics homework-question for all those against Hydrowaves in tournaments:
• If research showed that bream were stimulated by your sounder pings into feeding, would you take your sounder off your boat or turn it off in a tournament? SM |
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
|
Steve after reading all the responses I believe many members must have used them and it appears a fair amount of knowledge on the units.
Typical though the conversation reminds me of plastics versus gulps. I think personally idiots that can't fish and have no morals should be banned, problem is you can't always get what you want. Cheers Lee |
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Alex griezdorf wom AOY without a sounder 2 years ago.
__________________
Australian Designed and Owned |
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also to back up the soft plastic bit by Madeye, All these fish were caught on Madeye Whippyworms. ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by Tom Walker; 07-12-2012 at 09:10 AM. |
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is typically how fisheries are decimated. Mankind does not know when enough is enough. You can justify it however you want, but this technology crosses the line. I love technology also, but I do know when something is not fair play.
Yes, we have all of these other technologies, and yes, some of them should not have been allowed, but we have them. Doesn't make it right. Look what The GPS alone has done to our fishing stocks off shore. This technology is another nail in the coffin for ou fishery, and even if this first model isn't what it is advertised to be, I am sure new and better will be following soon after. |
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only first hand evidence about this things effectiveness in this thread suggests it is very effective.
At scaring fish away
__________________
REGULATE |
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
After doing my research I am coming around. Initially I was probably scared that the hydrowave was going to completely change how we fish for good (as a few of the U.S pro video's would attest) BUT, steve's comments based on actual experience as well as Jason Wilhelms' comments which can be found here https://www.facebook.com/jason.wilhe...23327291020038
have eased my concerns and personally I don't see it as as such an issue. I would like to withdraw my comments about banning them... next time I'll research before I comment haha Cheers |
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The main point and why this is so controversial is that you are changing the fishes behavior not with a lure but with a device mounted in your boat. There is a poll with 82 votes on it so far. 53 votes to ban and 29 to allow in comps. I think you may want to think about why. People don't want to go out and try one Steve, a lot of people think this is immoral by the looks of things. Cheers Chris
__________________
Yes I want a hamburger!!! god!!! Last edited by Bobby Bass; 07-12-2012 at 06:34 PM. |
![]() |
|
|